Showing posts with label college football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college football. Show all posts

Monday, July 6, 2009

College Football Midmajor Stars


I thoroughly enjoy college football. The sights, the sounds, the glory, the defeats. Not much better. I really enjoy the little guy climbing to the top. I'm also a little pretentious when it comes to college football trivia. I like reflecting on obscure midmajor stars of yore that had brief moments of glory on ESPN like Bowling Green's Omar Jacobs (2), LA Tech's Ryan Moats (2), and of course my personal hero in Hawai'i's Timmy Chang (2). For me, the best part of these guys' stories are the particularly heroic performances against insurmountable odds (e.g. Omar Jacobs versus Wisconsin or Chang's bowl game shootout with Houston's Kevin Kolb).

They're the random no name guys that are 90+ overall on your X-Box's version of NCAA. And they are heroes to the little guys: the Idahos, the Colorado States, the FIU's. Teams with little to no winning tradition (thus excluding the BYU, Boise States, or Utahs).
This year I'm looking for the next midmajor superstar. I'm thinking Case Keenum of Houston will have a great shot. For being the C-USA Offensive POY, Case was relatively silent on the national stage. This year, he's got two back-back big time opponents right at the start of the season to get the hype train fired up (OKSU on 9/12 and TTU on 9/26).

Any other midmajor stars we should watch for this season? Maybe the CMU QB Dan LeFevour?

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Conference Misalignment

As an environmental engineer I like to look at pollution numbers, energy efficiency, consumption, waste, etc.. So something that has interested me as of late is the distance-to-travel for ACC/SEC teams. I took Atlanta as a central point for ACC comparisons while Athens (the cesspool) is the center of the SEC world. Just for the Hell of it, I also came up with an interesting scenario.

ACC-SEC comparison
Looking at the ACC, GT is approximately 474 driving miles from all other 11 ACC foes. GA is 348. This means that at a rate of 60 mph, Georgie is 2 hours closer driving distance to all of its SEC brethren than Tech is to its ACC foes. That sucks. Comparing divisions, Tech's Coastal Division average drive is only 4 miles less than the ACC average at a whopping 470 driving miles. Georgie, in contrast, is 279 driving miles from Eastern Division foes making the average driving distance a ridiculous 3 hours less than Tech's average driving distance. That's pretty terrible, too.

Obviously, Miami, BC, and MD don't help Tech fans with driving times. But then again the ACC is spread so thin across the East Coast that removing those three teams only makes the ACC slightly worse than the SEC's actual average driving distance. When arguing conference supremacy, the SEC can definitely state proximity as a huge plus. Hell, I would've gone to almost every game if the average drive was only 4 or so hours. Then again, you can't really fly into most SEC cities anyways so you better be willing to drive.

Regional/Dream/Ridiculous Scenario
I've kind of been toying with the idea of a playoff that involves MASSIVE conference realignment across the board. Regionals divided up by proximity. The goal is to save energy, reduce transport time, and ultimately save money. I don't have the regions completely sectioned up but I think by 2050 or whenever gasoline has to be rationed, we'll be seeing something similar to this. Like the 1910's schedules where Tech would only go to one road game and teams would only play 5-6 games a year. I'll work up a post on this when I have more free time.

If Tech were to take its 11 closest I-A opponents to form a new ATL-centralized conference, the conference would include: Tech, Georgia, Auburn, Clemson, UAB, Troy, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, MTSU, Vandy, and FSU. Think about that. That's a lot of natural rivalries that could be reborn. Georgie, Auburn, and Clemson are obvious. Alabama brings back images of the epic Bryant-Dodd danceoffs. FSU is always close and ridiculous. Tech fans generally trust UT about as far as we can throw Phil Fulmer. The others are good fillers. The average drive time would reduce from the ACC's staggering 8 hours to a manageable 3 hours. Damn, that would be nice.

Interestingly enough, in the 50's an "Airplane Conference" was proposed by members of the current Pac 10, the Service Academies, and other dominant East Coast teams (like GT). The idea, at the time, was to create a super conference but the Pentagon didn't like the idea of flying college football teams back and forth across the country all season.

The Georgia Tech Universe Schedule

Now, I've been trying to explain to people why you can't use season stats to explain college football teams. I like using NFL stats generally moreso because of the parity and talent depth at the pro level. To me, college football is much more reliant on individual game performances and matchups less so than the NFL, which is moreso about warroom coaching and consistency.

In college football, you have many factors that lead to the rise and fall of college football teams. A major factor is "Who have you played?" or "Who have they played?" A look at the GT Universe Schedule shows the intracacies of the GT schedule. Momentum can be garnered or totally lost merely a game before someone plays us (read: one loss in CFB can ruin a season). The Universe Schedule also shows how comparable teams are to one another through the idea of "common opponents." That's a big time NCAA basketball buzzword but I like the idea for CFB as well since no one ever really likes to stray out of their region.

Any thoughts out there? I'm thinking the entire US should be broken down into 12-16 regionals to coincide with a major playoff configuration.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Easy Schedule = MNC

Georgia Tech is a decent schedule away from contending for the BCS title.
-- Southern Pigskin


A decent schedule?! Have you seen who we play this year?!

Now, now before you spit all over yourself in anger, take that comment as a compliment. More and more the BCS rewards those who don't take risks. Play OOC cupcakes, win, make money, play in the MNC. Matter of fact, don't even leave your stadium for those games (see Florida). The reward for beating a strong OOC BCS team is far less than risking a loss and thus, not worth it.

This view is shared by FSUncensored over at Tomahawk Nation who goes deeper into the numbers as he always does.

My theory is that teams should play the weakest possible non-conference schedule, because it is the pre-season rankings combined with a 0 or 1 loss season that gets a team to the National Championship. Additionally, playing cupcakes allows teams to rest their starters, leaving them less exposed to injury. Further, playing bad non-conference teams forces the national championship contender to have a greater focus on the conference games, which could potentially be overlooked when balanced with a difficult non-conference schedule.
--FSUncensored
So let's look at Tech's schedule and how it compares to the past BCS champions' schedule shown over on TN. I'll help you out: It's not a very difficult schedule.


Our schedule is a "tough" one with 2 away games vs. SEC opponents and 1 home game against Georgie. Our only cupcake is the Jacksonville State game. This is completely against the philosophy of the BCS title contenders. When it comes to debates of conference strength and who is the best, I think the best way to answer those questions is to look at OOC schedules. Beating up on each other within conference should only go so far in this argument.

Is it a tale of 2 wants? A championship in Atlanta would be a dream come true, but with a schedule like ours, history is against us. Do fans complain about easy scheduling from outside schools simply for enjoyment's sake? And then are content with the cupcake schedule for their own teams? It's something to consider. Part of all this issue is a result from the subjective decisions made by human pollsters who watch only a few games a week at most (yet another reason why the blogpoll is better). No one wants to appear like they got it wrong, and if the team with the big name wins, no matter the opponent, that team is going to get the bump up the polls.

Such goes the life of a college football fan.....

Thursday, May 14, 2009

College football starts 112 days early


The first victory of the 2009 football season has been claimed by the Aggies of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. They defeated Delaware State with a dose of disorder and terrible planning.

In case you were wondering, NC A&T is famous for a big ass brawl with NC-Central that resulted in the police having to spray mace into the riot (aka football teams) to stymie the violence.

Seriously, college football could not come any sooner. July 14th will be a nice relief but that will only partially remediate the growing void in my life that is the absence of college football. Oh well...

Random thoughts are welcome.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Renewing the Old Matchups

Was cruising around looking at the history of Georgia Tech football and started looking at the all-time wins and losses against all of our opponents. I sure would like to get rid of that cupcake game we play every year and play some teams that actually carry some weight. I made a table of the opponents we played the most in the past (a lot from our old Bobby Dodd and SEC and glory days) along with some other recognizable names. I kept off teams that are scheduled for the future no matter how far out.
Opponent W L T Pct.
Air Force 3 0 0 1.000
Baylor 3 1 0 0.750
Central Florida 3 0 0 1.000
Florida 23 9 6 0.684
Kentucky 11 7 1 0.605
LSU 12 7 0 0.631
Navy 16 9 0 0.640
Notre Dame 6 27 1 0.191
Penn State 3 4 0 0.429
Pitt 2 5 0 0.286
Southern Cal 1 2 0 0.333
Tennessee 17 24 2 0.419






I'd like to see Tennessee, Penn State, and Florida back on the schedule in that order. The old days were good to us and the match ups would surely be intriguing. Plus its always good to beat a "legendary power."

Who do you want to see? Don't see a team you want to play included in the list? Post in the comments!

Friday, April 24, 2009

Stadium Checklist

Anyone out there got a goal of reaching certain stadiums? I know I do. I'm trying to hit up the entire ACC/SEC before I pass by my football game traveling prime (young/single) years.

So far my fandom has taken me to the following ACC/SEC houses:

* Alumni Stadium (BC)
* Carter-Finley Stadium (NCSU)
* Jordan-Hare Stadium (Auburn)
* Lane Stadium (VT)
* Memorial Stadium (CU)
* Sanford Stadium (uga)
* Scott Stadium (UVA)
* Williams-Brice Stadium (USC)

I've also been to Notre Dame, Furman, Georgia Southern, GA Dome, and ALL-TEL Stadium for CFB games. The goal for this season is Vandy and FSU so that'll continue my slow completion of the Southeastern checklist. I don't really have much motivation to attend the Mississippi State game despite their inclusion in the SEC. Sort of like all the times I've been offered free tickets to go to Duke...and I just ask myself, "Why bother?"

If I could hit up a few games outside of the Southeast, I'd go to Penn State, Oregon, and maybe Michigan/Ohio State. Those seem like three stadiums where the atmosphere would be similar to the Southeastern stadiums.

Any well traveled fans out there? Got any good stories of travel or dream stadium visitations?

Thursday, February 19, 2009

5 + 5 reasons you should care about VT recruiting

I'm seriously strapped for time this week. So, I put on my Rachel Ray hat and tried to think of something fun and quick and marginally palatable. Furrer4heisman over at Gobbler Country was kind enough to make my rather crappy idea worth a few laughs.

He agreed to do a little word association over Google Talk. I would try to explain what I was thinking when I made the list of words, but screw it, it's funnier just to read the conversation.


me: what's up man
gobblercountry@gmail.com: drankin. what are you up to
me: watching king of the hill
want to help me write a post
in 15 lines
word association
gobblercountry@gmail.com: king of the hill is a lot funnier once youve lived in texas.
sure. what do you need.
me: alright
i say a word
you say the first thing that comes to your mind
warm up round
gobblercountry@gmail.com: lets do this
me: apples
gobblercountry@gmail.com: oranges
me: zz top
gobblercountry@gmail.com: beard
me: coke zero
gobblercountry@gmail.com: mixer
me: couch
gobblercountry@gmail.com: potatoe
me: longhorns
gobblercountry@gmail.com: faggots
me: well that was pretty good
alright, the rest is about VT's recruiting/current affairs/etc
ready?
gobblercountry@gmail.com: haha. lets do it.
me: recruiting
gobblercountry@gmail.com: boring
me: guy you don't want to meet in a dark alley
gobblercountry@gmail.com: boone
me: competition
gobblercountry@gmail.com: cornerback
me: tyrod taylor
gobblercountry@gmail.com: b.a.m.f.
me: tight end
gobblercountry@gmail.com: booooooooooooooooooone
me: dark horse
gobblercountry@gmail.com: dillard
me: passing game
gobblercountry@gmail.com: bourbon
me: beamerball
gobblercountry@gmail.com: dying?
me: nfl
gobblercountry@gmail.com: what the fuck is the nfl?
me: championship
gobblercountry@gmail.com: tis possible
me: alright
you won
gobblercountry@gmail.com: i won?
me: give yourself another drink
gobblercountry@gmail.com: kickass.
i believe i will


There you have it, folks. All the Yellow Jacket fan needs to know about what the Hokie's are up to. Be sure to check out Gobbler Country and leave a nice happy comment. We are used to disappointing losses in basketball, but Furrer4heisman may need a little cheering up after last night.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

5 reasons you should care about ...

It's almost football season!

Ok, no, it's really far away, but you can go ahead and start deciding how next season is going to turn out. Yes, even you can have my extraordinary predictive abilities, becoming a seer of all things college football. And I am here to give you the resources you need to do so. So begins our exploration of our enemies' recently finalized recruiting business, starting with the North Carolina Tar heels.

The top 5 reasons you should care about UNC's recruiting activities:

1. Because they made us look really, really bad last year. Duh. We turned the ball over 3 times within 40 yards of their goal line. They didn't need the help, but with those kinds of gifts, they couldnt help but beat us. Badly. Sigh...

2. Hakeem Nicks didn't leave. In fact, he just changed his name. That's what UNC fans seem to think, at least, of Jheranie Boyd. Highlight reels are always strange, because great high school players often way outclass their opponents, but this kid actually may be the real deal.

3. Butch Davis will cut a bitch.

4. Donte Moss is a scary, scary man. I have a hard time reading ESPN's writeups of recruits, because even decent college coaching is far superior to any high school coaching. This kid has all the tools to become a man-beast.

5. Bryn Renner - Despite having a stupid name and herp on the face, he is expected to be a serious QB threat. You know, the kind that generally destroy our secondary (see Fatford to Massaquoi, 11/29/08).


Next up, we are going to look at a team we beat AND WE HAVE 9 CHOICES FOR THAT HAHAHAHA THANK YOU PAUL JOHNSON.


Oh yeah, To Hell With georgia!

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

The Return of the King

[I won't ask you to bear with me, but yes, sports will be involved... eventually]

[Also, Winfield tried to change my title. Not happening.]

Yes, it's been a while.
It's a long story. After a certain bowl game, both of my parents were murdered by a bum with a gun. I spent the next 15 years in the care of the family butler, a troubled soul that longed for revenge. I eventually fled the country, found myself in a Chinese prison, and was rescued by a mysterious, bearded man who told me to fetch a rare flower and find him in the mountains. He then trained me in the ways of the ninjistu, but I could not sell my soul by killing a detained (albeit guilty) man. I then returned home, determined to protect the innocent from the wicked.

Actually, that's the story of Batman Begins. Sorry, my life isn't quite that awesome.

Yes, I've been on hiatus, but for good reason. Between school starting again (the biggest reason - I need to dropkick this semester in the scrotum) and for other happenings in my life, I've had to focus on other things. I'm getting older, and I know this because I'm becoming my biggest critic. I've also learned/reinforced some other values/dictums in my life. Two of the ones that stick out can be summed up in quick bits of wisdom.

1. Busy is not productive. In fact, being busy is usually directly at odds with being productive.

2. Doing something easy is usually bad for you, or isn't worth your time.


I finally broke down and began to read Timothy Ferriss's book, The 4-Hour Work Week. I won't recommend reading or not reading it, because no one reading this blog probably gives a damn. However, I will say that he does a good job stating the obvious. Most of the book is essentially about staying on task and avoiding interruptions. I did take a piece of his advice, and began to only check my email twice a day. My God, the difference! I thought I was acting like a grown-up by reading my e-mail all the time. I had a rough time juggling everything I was trying to do last semester, and Ferriss is right - your e-mail is probably your single biggest distraction. It is absolutely awful for productivity. Of course, I always felt connected, and always knew what was going on, and always had new information about where to be or what to do or what is funny careening into my eyeballs all of the time, but I couldn't focus on a damn thing. In the very short time that I have stopped checking my email accounts multiple times (read, continuously), my productivity level has skyrocketed and my stress level has taken a dive. It's great.

I'm telling you this because I want to apologize. I had a lot of posts that sucked (at least I think they did, because they were lazy), mainly because I was busy trying to do homework, study for a test, read something, call somebody, carry on a conversation, reading/writing an email, etc. when I was trying to blog. My bad.

The second part is actually part of the reason I couldn't bring myself to write anything for a while. Have you ever noticed that people who have GPS systems usually can't drive worth a shit, much less get to where they are going any more efficiently? Or how people who only watch cable news are usually the worst at describing the platforms and implications of said platforms of political candidates? That is basically how I feel about everyone (excluding Orson and Dr. Saturday, because, well, they do what they do better than anyone else) who had something to say about the National Champions, namely, who should be crowned the holder of the MNC. Put anyone who talked about how a playoff works better, and anyone who typed the words "let them prove/settle it on the field." [As I am typing this, I'm specifically avoiding checking to see if either I or Winfield or Bird ever said this. What can I say, I love it when people call me out in the comments, so much so I basically give them a proverbial lay-up.] Rereading the same, tired, boring "there should be a playoff, the corporations are evil" articles really left a bad taste in my mouth. It didn't make me hate football - it just made me hate talking about it.

If you came here in the past couple of weeks wanting to read what I had to say about Utah, Florida, Southern California and Texas, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm not cut out for being a CFB blogger. Maybe being willing to ruminate (as in the physical, chew something that has already been chewed like a freaking cow) the same tedious topics with the ridiculous, cookie-cutter (and usually easily refuted) dialogue really IS a requirement for successful blogging. We'll see. Maybe in three weeks, I'll never post again (that's definitely not the plan).

Hopefully you'll come back over and over again, and I can give you something to read that you haven't seen before. I'm not promising I'll always be unique, and I'm not promising that most of my post topics won't overlap with other blogs. However, I'm going to try my best to not take the easy way when it comes to writing. Hopefully, you will be able to tell.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Backyard Bowling



Got a message last night about midnight saying we are going bowling in our own backyard.
Click here to reserve your tickets. A press conference is scheduled for 1pm this afternoon.

No opponent has been set but lots of things seem to be pointing towards LSU. South Carolina has been thrown in the mix but that seems unlikely. The best match-up would be us against Ole Miss but I think they go to Florida for a New Years Day bowl somewhere. Either way, it's us against the SEC...yet another chance to show how flawed that conference is.

Click here to see what LSU fans are saying in regards to a possible match-up against us.

The last time Georgia Tech played in the Peach/CFA Bowl was in 2000 which was also against LSU.

Monday, December 1, 2008

The Monday After...Links!


Oh yes.


It has been stenciled in the mirror since the day Paul Johnson came on campus: “Beat Georgia”. After this weekend, we can all look back and proudly say “Accomplished.”

Remember earlier in the season? We were dubbed a team with a “high school offense” and that we would not succeed in the BCS conferences with our offense. Well you who criticize before you know what you’re talking about….go suck it! Two days after our own drought has ended, I’m not sure if the feeling has completely set in yet. We beat the preseason national champions. We beat St. Richt and we beat the Bulldogs while Stafford arguably had one of his best games of his career. Paul Johnson and Georgia Tech are here to stay and our presence has been felt. Here’s what’s floating around the internet after the jubilee Saturday afternoon.

The Georgia Sports Blog is depressed. hahahaha!


The AJC writers have faced reality: We are better than the Bulldogs.

Jeff Shulz says we’re a rivalry again.

Furman Bisher writes, in his old prose-style way, how that game means more than a trip to Tampa. And for this year, yes, I have to agree.

Sports Illustrated, yes the publication that predicted us to win 3 games, gives Paul Johnson praise

The Chattanooga Times-Free Press jumps on the bandwagon as well. The love is overflowing for Paul Johnson

Paul Newberry, a national AP writer, discusses the expectation levels set for GT and UGAg and how both teams met (or failed to meet) those levels.

The Macon Telegraph’s Coley Harvey writes his own article about our victory in the Cesspool.

I love these quotes:
Rennie Curran, UGA linebacker, “We were well-coached”
Josh Nesbitt: “They had no idea what we were going to do.”

It’s great to be a Yellow Jacket!

Friday, November 21, 2008

A Georgia Tech/ Miami Conversation with Gobbler Country

Yesterday during Miami's whoopin', Furrer4heisman, from Gobbler Country and I traded text messages. The conversation was so ridiculous, I had to share it:

2:35 PM EST

Me: Out of work for the day. Thirty minutes from whiskey
Gobbler: Ha ha. I’m still a few hours away. Give it hell.

7:04 PM

Gobbler: Getting’ dranked

7:18 PM EST

Me: Helll Yeah!

7:33 PM EST --(Team just runs out of tunnel)

Gobbler: Fuckin’ love yalls secondary fight song
Me: Up with the white and gold?
Gobbler: Fuck yes

7:57 PM--(I believe this was J. Dwyer's 25 yard 1st down conversion)

Me: suck on that!
Gobbler: You can’t fucking arm tackle j dwyer son! Woo! Drunk!

8:02 PM

Gobbler: Gee running plays that use their speed against them. What a concept. Fuck you Stinespring.

8:07 PM--(It took me forever to figure out where this came from. Then I realized that Mark Texeira and Jason Varitek were at the game and had been shown on tv)

Gobbler: Fuck Mark Texeira. Fuck you fucking prick. Worse piece of shit ever.


Sidenote: T.I. and supposedly Ludacris were also in attendance. Downtown Atlanta, Nighttime, Celebrities all over the field with 112 recruits watching us dominate...can you ask for a better game?


8:11 PM--(Roddy Jones runs his first long run of the night)


Me: Nation, meet Roddy Jones

8:18 PM --(Don't remember honestly)

Gobbler: You need a QB with two good legs if the O-line is going to suck like that.

8: 22 PM --(Pick 6 Michael Johnson!)



Me: Meet Michael Johnson
Gobbler: Michael Johnson is my main mother fucker!!!

8:47 PM --(Instant Replay confirms the call on the field, it is a catch)

Gobbler: What? You guys just got fucked.

8:54 PM

Gobbler: J dwyer all up in this bitch
Me: Word

9:29 PM--(This was sent after it took me 2 hours to put two-and-two together when Dane told me "Nikke Meyer is behind us". She was using her volleyball recruiting visit.)

Me: Nikki Meyer is here fyi. As in Urban’s daughter. Right behind me.
Gobbler: Niiiice. I’ve seen those photos. Is she 18 yet?
Me: Not yet I don’t think.
Gobbler: Even better

10:08 PM--(The Blowout continues..)

Gobbler: Snoopy Dance!
Me: I don’t think anyone expected this

10:09 PM--(Lucas Cox rumbles for a big gain)

Gobbler: White running backs are the wave of the future!
Gobbler: I’m having so much fn and I’m in my living room.

10:20 PM--(End of the 3rd quarter)

Gobbler: when you say BUDWEISER…you’ve said it all!

10: 58 PM --(Jackets win!)

Me: You’re welcome

11:03 PM

Gobbler: Wooo fuckin hooooo! Thanks Jackets!

12: 18 AM --(And back to Nikki Meyer)

Gobbler: If you know what’s good for you, you got photos of urban’s daughter to post tomorrow
Me: Damn it!
Gobbler: You…Dumb…Fuck

Note: Rumor has it that Nikki leaves Saturday night. Volleyball has senior night that evening. To those who care, I'll see what I can do.

Dear Virginia, Virginia Tech, and North Carolina

You're welcome. We have now done a big thing for you. Please return the favor by promptly losing this weekend.

Thank you.

Memorable Darryl Richard (AKA The Ambassador) quotes from last night (From HD's latest article):

On the ACC being a crazy conference:


"Who knows, in this conference, I'm telling you, the way they play hot potato
with the trophy, don't be surprised if somebody gives it up on Saturday and we
get to sit there and watch them do it," Richard said, grinning after his team's 41-23 throttling of Miami. "It's great to just sit back and
watch. That's what we're going to do, sit back and watch."

On what needs to happen for Tech to win the Coastal:

"We need NC State to handle North Carolina, if Clemson wants to play in a
bowl game this year they're going to take care of Virginia, and hopefully
Virginia gets something done in Blacksburg," he said without taking a breath,
knowing there are currently five teams in the Coastal Division with three
losses."

On Pre-season expectations:

"Everybody pretty much laughed at us when we were killing ourselves in the
offseason," Richard said. "Look at me now. Who has the last laugh?"

On CPJ being Coach of the Year:

"How many people thought he was going to get it done?" Richard asked. "I
mean, not only are we bowl eligible, but now we really have a chance to play in
the championship game by a guy who came in and changed the offense from a pro
style to an option-based spread. Let's be honest, if you can show me a better
candidate, I would like to hear it, and I would definitely refute a lot of the
facts people might put up, but he's done a hell of a job here."

Pat Nix sucks!

ACC Roundtable #4 has been posted.

More to come later today.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Miami Irrational Game Preview

We attempted valiantly to find a Miami Guest Blogger but got no responses. They are either assholes or they are scared stiff of our penetrating questions.

Irrational Game Preview!

What: Miami at Georgia Tech: WHITE OUT!
When:
Thursday 7:30PM
TV: ESPN
Will The Legacy Crew be there? Hellz yes!
Will The Legacy Crew be wearing white? You know it!

This Thursday we battle for our ACC lives (along with Virginia Tech’s and Virginia’s) for our faint breath of life for the ACC Championship Game. It will be cold. It had better be white. SUCK IT UP!

Miami Wins If: Patrick Nix learns how to run an offense. If Miami’s D-Line can get through our seemingly “Swiss Cheese” O-Line and get to Jaybo (Yes, I said Jaybo!)

Georgia Tech Wins If: We hold on to the ball. (duh) UNC was the epitome of our season. We rank 117th out of 118 when it comes to fumbles. That’s embarrassing. Tech wins if our defense remembers its former self (Lights out!). Jahi and Vance are back. The secondary praises God for Jahi’s return. The time has come for Jaybo to grow up on national television!

Sidenotes: Miami is 15-1 on Thursday Nights (or is it 13?) Either way, it’s good. Tech has beaten the ‘Canes 3 years in a row.

Irrational Scoring Prediction: The off-week helps the Jackets immensely and the cold hurts Miami’s combo of quarterbacks as we option it down their throats

Georgia Tech 17 Miami 10

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

ACC Roundtable #4

This weeks Roundtable is brought to by Brendan at From Old Virginia. The ACC Roundtable is a discussion amongst a group of bloggers who represent the ACC. In addition to us and From Old Virginia, they are:

Block-C (Clemson)
Gobbler Country (Virginia Tech)
College Game Balls (Virginia Tech)
BC Interruption (Boston College)
Tar Heel Mania (North Carolina)

Below are our responses to this week's assortment of questions. Enjoy and post your comments below!

1. Take a look into your team's past, as far back as you like. If you could pick one game and change its outcome, which would you choose and why?

If there was one game recently, it would have to be the 2006 UGAg game. A win there gives us a ton of momentum going to Jacksonville the following week. A win there means Chan's tenure finally turned the corner after all of the off-the-field crap he had to deal with. It was a game a lot of GT fans were really hurt by because it was the first time in a long time that GT was much better than UGAg leading into the game and poor team management ultimately led us to a loss. 2006 really was a defining year for Chan because it was one of the best assembled GT teams since Joe Hamilton. There were a lot of junior and seniors on the team including the defensive/offensive backfield not to mention All-World, nay, All-Universe Calvin Johnson.The 2006 season saw Chan grow in a lot of GT fans hearts. Everyone finally saw the maturation of all of his players. Ultimately, however, the season ended with more off-the-field issues (Reggie/Kenny Scott academics and Pat Nix/ Jon Tenuta dislike for each other) along with three heartbreaking losses. A lot of GT fans can relate straight back to that Thanksgiving weekend game for the loss of momentum going in to the ACCCG and the eventual termination of Chan in '07.

Historically, there are two others that would've been nice 1) GT could've used a win in Chapel Hill in 1990 to really cement that MNC and 2) Bobby Dodd's final season really deserved a W over the bastards from Athens, which would've probably led to the '66 MNC.

2. What non-ACC program most resembles yours?

There aren't many teams are similar to us in the country. Most teams that string together several winning seasons usually continually grow and improve and the coach departs or the team reaches a stable 10 win plateau. So in the W/L, I wouldn't compare us to many teams because we have very few extremely bad seasons and very few extremely good seasons.
I would like to compare us to the perennial underdog, non-flagship schools out there such as Texas Tech, Oregon State, or OK State. Teams that have severe disadvantages in fan numbers in their home states but still continue to compete with the instate football factories. I'd be willing to argue with fans from most of these schools that GT is probably one of the more successful non-flagship teams in college football history.

Look at some notable non-flagship winning percentages - Texas Tech vs. UT-A (25%), K. State vs. Kansas (34%), Oregon St. vs. Oregon (41%), OK State vs. OU (17%), Tulane vs. LSU (23%), Vandy vs. UT-K (27%), Iowa State vs Iowa (35%). FYI GT is 37% against the dogs. Thankfully, GT has never fallen into some of these teams' situations of losing 15-20 straight to their most hated opponent. That would be like watching Deliverance over and over every day for four-fifths of my lifetime. Either way hats off to the non-flagships. Keep on fighting the good fight.


3. Which do you prefer? The ACC of 2008: not too well respected around the nation, but a conference in which almost any team has a shot at the conference title? Or the ACC of 1998: getting plenty of respect from football pundits as a good conference, but dominated by one hegemonic superpower that we all hate?

There are pros and cons to both. But in the end, we see the truth. We would rather take the ACC of 2008, where all the teams seemed to have turned the corner to good and great teams. We're staying with what we've said all year: "It's ACC parity!" It's not mediocrity. Eventually the media will catch on! Everyone is beating everyone and we could theoretically have 10 teams bowl eligible. The media will soon see how the conference has improved itself as a whole and will rely on the conference rather than that one "hegemonic superpower."


4. Hey, it's basketball season! What are your expectations for your team? What kind of season would make you happy?

GT will be the thorn in everyones side this season. A seasoned point guard in Mo Miller returns with a great front count in Lawal, Aminu, and Peacock along with the addition of McDonald's All-American Iman Shumpert. We can see GT middling in the ACC this year and having a small chance to make the NCAA's. We won't be a Jarrett Jack and Co. show stopper type team but we'll be exciting to watch and we see this team having some of the best continuity that we've had since Jack, Ish, and BJ left in '05.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

How do you win the ACC?

Note: We have a new writer who has joined us. His name is Bird.

As my first post, I would like to drop some statistical analysis on how to win the ACC. This is based entirely on data provided by the post-expansion ACC (2004 forward, all BC data in 2004 is excluded).

Typically, in college football points scored per game goes hand in hand with a teams W/L column. However, the ACC offers us a bit of a different perspective on the matter. In the ACC, it is more important to have low defensive points per game than higher offensive points per game.

Every ACCC has featured the #1 scoring defense leading into the ACCC while the #1 scoring offense leading into the ACCC has been sitting at home watching the past two years (Clemson both times).

Below are some basic graphs showing Scoring Offense vs. Wins and Scoring Defense vs. Wins. You can use the linear regressions to predict your wins/losses for the remainder of the season (e.g. GT should win 6-7 games total for the season based on their offensive output but 8-9 based on their defense). I included this seasons wins/losses by normalizing them across a 13 game season for every team in the ACC that should make a bowl and 12 game season for those that wouldn't.







Currently, GT is the #1 defense but I do not see that lasting through the Miami/uga games while UNC is a close second and I see their defensive stats improving against the Terps, mighty Dookies, and hapless Wolfpack. Look for FSU to take the other division. Predicting the winner is a little more difficult because there are less points to interpret and because the statistically disadvantaged team has won twice (FSU in '05 and Wake in '06).

If I were betting man though, I'd put money on the team with the better turnover ratio and in this case it's UNC at +1.44 per game. However, the last time FSU won the ACC, they came into the ACCC with a negative turnover ratio. Look for UNC in the Orange Bowl unless UNC manages to Marcus-Vick-it-up in the ACCC.

Friday, November 7, 2008

Irrational UNC preview

It’s time for this week’s irrational preview of North Carolina. The Tarheels come in with a 6-2 overall record and are 2-2 in the ACC. They are bit one piece of the mess that is the battle for the Coastal Division.

Where: Keenan Stadium, Chapel Hill, NC
When: Noon (don’t get us started)
TV: Raycom (Again, don’t get us started)
Is the Legacy crew going? Hellz yes!

On to the what-ifs!

Carolina wins if: They are prepared and disciplined. They had to have seen how bad FSU looked against our offense when Nesbitt was in the game. Defensively, they allow 113 rushing yards per game. Obviously that number will go up because all we do is run the ball (until they fall asleep and then we beat them through the air!). How will Tech’s offensive line hold up with out Andrew Gardner? That is a wild card that can only be answered on Saturday. The ‘Heels offense seems lackluster when looking at statistics. For them to win, they must beat our weaknesses, most notably our beat-up secondary. Can the backups continue to play at a high level?

Tech wins if: As stated above, our secondary must play at a high level. Carolina is going to throw the football. Step up! Nesbitt is an “X” factor. How healthy is his ankle? Can he still run? If the answer is yes, then we’ll own the ground and no one can stop us (save an already struggling O-Line without their anchor. Eventually Scott Blair will not be able to run down a kick returner. Let it not be this week.

Sidenotes: Got some interesting tidbits from one Heather Dinich this morning:
  • In all 6 of UNC’s wins, they were playing from behind at one point. Their 2 losses were when they were winning.
  • UNC is the team leader in interceptions, too bad we don’t throw much!
  • This game will be my 8th of a possible 12 ACC stadiums. Projections currently have me at attending 10 of 12 stadiums before I get out.


Irrational Score Prediction: Georgia Tech 24 North Carolina 12

What is your "X" factor for tomorrow? What's your score prediction? Comment below!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

ACC Roundtable #3: The Wrap-Up

This 3rd week of the ACC Roundtable was generously brought to you by us, The Legacyx4. The most important questions revolved around where the conference stands in the long run when compared to the rest of the BCS conferences. Below are this week's participating blogs and links to their discussion:
Boston College: BC Interruption
Virginia Tech: College Gameballs
Virginia Tech: Gobbler Country
Clemson: Block-C
Virginia: From Old Virginia
Georgia Tech: The Legacyx4
North Carolina: Tar Heel Mania

Here's a recap of the questions:

1. There is no question as to whether the ACC is one of the toughest conferences this year as far as its constituents are concerned. Currently, 4 teams are bowl eligible while 5 are within one game of reaching eligibility. Is it mediocrity, or is the ACC on its way to being the powerhouse that expansion was supposed to bring?

2. With a few notable exceptions, quarterback play in the ACC has been poor across the past couple of seasons, contributing at least in some part to the lack of offensive potency in the conference. Where does the ACC stand today in terms of quarterback play, and do you think our offenses are improving?

3. There are 5 out-of-conference games left for the ACC - BC/Notre Dame, Wake Forest/Vandy, Clemson/USC, GT/Georgia, and FSU/Florida. We went 3-2 in those games last year, and then 2-5 in bowl play (with the only wins coming over Michigan State and UConn). How do you feel we as a conference will compete against the rest of the NCAA in the final weeks of the season, and are you confident in our bowl play?

4. As far as Tech fans are concernced, ACC officiating is absolutely atrocious, both in conference (helmet-to-helmet, lack of holding calls) and out of conference. Are you in agreement? List any specific, obvious grievances, or use this opportunity to verbally assault ACC refs.

5. Every college football fan has a favorite player not on their team. Who is that player for you in the ACC?


To avoid redundancy, we're going to lump questions 1 and 2 together. The blogs emphasize the potential of the conference. The league is young and we have clearly not arrived at the "national powerhouse" level we all hope to see the ACC become. In the words of BC Interruption, the quarterbacks "are turrible," but the most common factor and reason for this "turribleness" is the majority of inexperienced quarterbacks. Best case scenario says that the ACC in 2-3 years becomes what the Big 12 is today (as compared to the worst case, where we continue to be the ACC). Another common view brought on by the Roundtable is how we stack up to the rest of the BCS conferences. The consensus is not good. Many of us put the conference ahead of the Big East as it still struggles to prove prove that it deserves anything. When we all look at bowl projections, the possible Orange Bowl matchups are nightmares. The majority of blogs do not like the matchups. Though the ACC is tougher and better than it's been, we all agree that the "Elite of the ACC" does not match up well with the "Elite of the rest." It is the mid-tier bowls where we can hopfully show our improvement this year.

Remaining out-of-conference games:
The most common game that the bloggers picked is Wake Forest beating Vanderbilt. Though Dane does continue the tradition of The Legacy Crew being bold in our picks and admits that it would be "no surprise to see us going 4-1" in that week with the exception being Florida State losing to Florida. Yes, Dane does have a major boner crush on the Gators and Urban Meyer (says the guy who has a blow up doll with "THE LEACH" written across the chest in magic marker - Dane). Boston College seemed to have the second most enthusiastic crowd as it was picked to win its final OOC game against Notre Dame in the Catholic Bowl this weekend. After that, it's all a belief that the teams can "play it closer than in the past." The improvement is clear, we just aren't where we need to be quite yet. In summary, the ACC Roundtable sees more competitive games this year but still no better outcomes.

Officials Vent:
The ACC Roundtable seems to be made up of old men who are too complacent and passive. The Legacy Crew is proud to be the ones who put a little fire,yelling, and pissed off drunk attitude into the discussion! Yes, bad officiating happens everywhere, we'll admit it. However! When given the chance we will gladly rip the officials a new one and curse their mother's grave and the whistles that they blow! Assholes! College Gameballs, BC Interruption, and Gobbler Country all reply with a resounding *yawn* "bad officiating happens." *yawwwwn* From Old Virginia admits there is a problem and seems mildly annoyed with the issue.

Hey Block-C : we get the gist. Holding happens. Sometimes it doesn't get called, but we feel that violations like a prevented sack and safety should probably get a flag. However, photo evidence shows how much Clemson fans appreciate when refs don't call out people when they are holding somethin' ridiculous:




Favorite Players:
There are players who people can just enjoy to watch no matter what team they play on. We asked fellow members of the Roundtable who their favorite player was that they enjoyed to watch. Georgia Tech and North Carolina lead the way with exciting players in (former) GT WR Calvin Johnson and B-Back Jon Dwyer. BC Interruption needed a gun put to their heads to finally admit that Hakeem Nicks of UNC sparks their interest. Block-C surprisingly looks to a Florida State defensive player as a role model in Myron Rolle.


Look for Roundtable #4 to come around sometime next week.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

ACC Roundtable #3

We are hosting the ACC Roundtable this week, so look below for our very own questions and Dane's Responses. Later in the week (Thursday hopefully) Winfield will write the Roundtable Wrap-up.
Here are the blogs who have partken so far: Block-C, Gobbler Country, College Gameballs, BC Interruption, and From Old Virginia.
Comment below!

1. There is no question as to whether the ACC is one of the toughest conferences this year as far as its constituents are concerned. Currently, 4 teams are bowl eligible while 5 are within one game of reaching eligibility. Is it mediocrity, or is the ACC on its way to being the powerhouse that expansion was supposed to bring?

As much as I hate the terms "parity" and "top to bottom," the ACC, top to bottom, has more parity than any other conference in the nation. The SEC is a two-team conference this year - Ole Miss won an upset due to the reigning in of the Tebow, protecting him for the second half of the season. UF burned themselves that game - when compared to when they played LSU, you can see that the Gators were holding back. No other conference has been as back and forth with what you can actually describe as quality play than the ACC (that's a boldfaced lie, the Big 12 probably wins out, but this is an ACC blog so screw it).

However, I don't think you can say anything about where we are going as a conference, only look at where we have been. I honestly think that overall, the ACC is a better conference this year. We may lack a nationally dominant team as of right now, but I would bet on at least an even split with any other conference if we were to go top-down against them. Part of the reason for this increase production is coaching. the ACC has always had players that are as good as say, the SEC, but coaching has just been poor. Now that coaches like former Duke coach Ted Roof and Randy Shannon have had a little bit of time to start molding their programs, and the additions of Cutcliffe at Duke and Johnson at Tech (not to mention that the perenially underachieving Bowden is gone), I expect the conference to continue to utilize all of the talent it has, but only time will tell.

2. With a few notable exceptions, quarterback play in the ACC has been poor across the conference the past couple of seasons, contributing at least in some part to the lack of offensive potency in the conference. Where does the ACC stand today in terms of quarterback play, and do you think our offenses are improving?

(Winfield's Response: I don't have a lot of time to look into this but here is the gist of my belief)

ACC quarterback play is not as bad as the mainstream media wants you to think. Quality quarterback play along with improved offenses are on the rise because the number of quality head coaches have increased within the conference. The argument can be made the the historically bottom half of the conference has improved in their staffing of coaches. The willingness to get rid of the old and bring in something new is the reason for improved offenses and quarterbacks.

3. There are 5 out-of-conference games left for the ACC - BC/Notre Dame, Wake Forest/Vandy, Clemson/USC, GT/Georgia, and FSU/Florida. We went 3-2 in those games last year, and then 2-5 in bowl play (with the only wins coming over Michigan State and UConn). How do you feel we as a conference will compete against the rest of the NCAA in the final weeks of the season, and are you confident in our bowl play?

As far as the season games go BC should knock off Notre Dame this weekend with fairly little ease. The rest of the games came on Thanksgiving weekend last year and we split 2-2. FSU probably won't beat Florida, but the other three are toss-ups. Wake and Vandy are both very well coached teams, Georgia Tech is f***ing tired of losing, and so is USC. Also, coaching at Clemson and UGA are weaker than their opponents as of right now, so going 4-1 in the season OOC games wouldn't suprise me.

Looking at the Week 10 Bowl projections on ESPN, which really don't mean anything right now, I love our chances to dominate bowl season. Every projected matchup looks winnable. I am high on the ACC right now, what can I say? Every team (well, maybe not N.C. State) has proven that they can hang with or beat any reasonably good team, so why wouldn't I feel good about it.

4. As far as Tech fans are concernced, ACC officiating is absolutely atrocious, both in conference (helmet-to-helmet, lack of holding calls) and out of conference (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tobqLJlxDBs). Are you in agreement? List any specific, obvious grievances, or use this opportunity to verbally assault ACC refs.

Well, I've already listed the things I can't stand. I won't even mention the fact that our DE Derrick Morgan was held like a tilling bull when we had FSU pinned in the endzone this past weekend - I'll opt for the second.

F*** you you f***ing zebras. I hope you all wind up in the side circle of Hell reserved for people who are incompetent at jobs that other people rely on, like DMV workers and elected officials. When you have a blog that chronicles how bad you suck at your jobs (which has moved completely to YouTube, I think), like miscalling F***ING FIELD GOALS, you should probably seek a new line of work that you can succeed in. I would honestly rather have SEC officials ref our games whenever we play UGA, because you at least know you are going to get nailed on every close call. The only thing that pisses me off more than seeing people throw stuff onto Grant Field from the stands of Bobby Dodd Stadium is when I see them miss your f***ing faces with a full bottle of water. One time I want to see one of you assholes, especially one that calls a BS helmet-to-helmet call, get slammed in the face with something heavy.


5. Every college football fan has a favorite player not on their team. Who is that player for you in the ACC?

I'd have to go with whoever the hell was blocking for Cedric Peerman when UVA played us. I didn't get the numbers of the left tackle and left guard, but wow, they opened up the world for a hell of a runningback. I haven't seen someone lock it up as hard as they have all season.

Guest Blogger: Tarheel Edition

First off, look for our ACC Roundtable update later today.

Our Guest Blogger this week is Jake from TareEye or Buckheel. Yes, he is a confused individual who can't seem to make up his mind to cheer for tOSU or UNC. We traded questions earlier this week and here are his responses. Click here to see our responses on his site.


1. It seems as if Butch Davis is making his mark in Chapel Hill. What about him is so different from John Bunting?

Bunting is a Carolina man that had the backing of the administration and his teams mostly for that reason. He represented the University well, but he just wasn’t a good football coach.

Even though Carolina finished last season with four wins, which was only one more than Bunting’s final season, it was clear that Davis was changing things.

Why? Well, it was mostly the little things that he implemented that began to change the culture. All of the sudden, the home games were amped up with fireworks, pregame festivities and other little things that just made fans excited.

A general feeling that football would return to glory engulfed Chapel Hill.

As a fan, I can genuinely say that until the last week or so with all the preseason polls and discussion I have not been looking forward to basketball season.

Blasphemy! I can’t say that’s true for the entire fan base, but it certainly is true for those that appreciate football here at Carolina. It’s a process—Carolina fans are conditioned to enjoy basketball more, but Butch is changing that.

This link about sums up why he's a better coach.

But when it comes to the X’s and O’s I think Davis’ willingness to experiment and adapt separates him from Bunting. Davis still makes coaching mistakes—the management of the Virginia game most noticeably—but he truly is a fan’s coach.

2. Last week, Florida State tried to prepare for the triple option by practicing without a ball. How are the Tar Heels preparing for our offense?

You know I haven’t heard any details, but I know last week the Heels rested and started looking at Georgia Tech, so they’ve had an extra week to prepare for the offense.

That’s interesting that Florida State practiced without a ball. Davis hasn’t mentioned anything in his press conferences other than saying that Georgia Tech’s offense forces the secondary to play closer to the line of scrimmage, setting up for play action passes.

From my basic knowledge, the triple option requires the linebackers and lineman to play extremely disciplined. If the quarterback decides to keep it, going straight after him sets up for a big play via the pitch.

The Heels are speedy, but I would argue that they lack speed at defensive end and the linebackers. The defensive tackles—most notably Marvin Austin—are NFL sized and should take away the fullback, but I would have thought the same about Florida State—the play where the fullback took the ball straight up the middle was nifty.

Yet Carolina has merely limited opponents’ running game rather than taking it away. Obviously, this will be the key to the game—can UNC limit the running game?

3. We have not had a lot of time to actually look at Carolina's basic defensive setup. Describe it to us. Who is the defensive player to avoid?

Trimane Goddard is a beast at safety and has made several game-changing interceptions, most notably against Miami. He’s tied for fourth in the nation with 5 picks this season.

Carolina runs a basic 4-3 defense and limits blitzing on passing downs. For the most part, the Heels prefer to play it safe, and it has paid off as they have are tied for first in most interceptions by a team.

A lot of anger from the fan base resulted from the Virginia game in which the Heels played prevent defense late and allowed a game-tying touchdown. This defense also allowed Boston College to score two touchdowns—both at the end of the halves.

The biggest knock on the Heels is definitely the failure of the prevent defense. It allowed Notre Dame, Miami, Virginia and Boston College to drive down much of the field late in the game. Fortunately, turnovers sealed the victory for the Heels against Notre Dame and Miami.

This prevent defense utilizes three lineman and eight defensive backs. However, I don’t think this defense will be unveiled against Georgia Tech unless the game comes down to a 2 minute drill. Carolina doesn’t ever use a standard nickel package—five defensive backs, two linebackers and four lineman—to my knowledge.

4. Who is one player that is going to have to step it up, even up to average, in order for y'all to win?

Cam Sexton has been the key for the Heels since Yates and now Tate have gone down.

The defense has been fairly reliable this season; I expect them to give Carolina a chance in every game with a big play or two—I’m always surprised with the plays they pull out.

But when Sexton shines, the Heels are difficult to defend. Even without Tate, Carolina employs several weapons at receiver that make them extremely dangerous. Hakeem Nicks is a beast of a receiver that can make plays downfield or turn short passes into huge gains. If Sexton can get Nicks the ball, and, most importantly, turn the ball over no more than once, than the Heels have a great chance to win the game.

Butch Davis found out against Virginia that you cannot play it safe—you must place confidence in your quarterback to make plays down the field. Sexton has proved that several times this season, but his tendency to throw interceptions dates back Bunting’s final season.

If Sexton turns the ball over more than once than the Heels loses this game. Period.



5. We are banged up as a team, but our secondary has probably had the worst of it. Do you predict the same amount of exploitation of this current weakness as we do?

Carolina’s strength is the passing game. With a few of the moving pieces gone, though, it seemed like it would regress. At first it did against Virginia, but it emerged again against Boston College—a team also weak in the secondary.

I don’t expect the type of outburst that Sexton and Nicks had against Boston College, but certainly that is what the coaches will focus on.

Carolina’s Shaun Draughn is quietly having a successful season after being moved from safety to running back. Draughn’s production surprises me as he does not seem like he would be a productive back, but the Heels have made it work. Draughn’s ability to hit the hole quickly allows the Heels to move the ball much better, but hasn’t shown more than giving the offense four or five yards consistently. He has not made many long plays.

Georgia Tech cannot sleep on the running game as the coaches have shown the willingness to exploit teams with whatever works.

But Carolina likes to pass on first down—something I love—and it can get them in trouble. However, it also makes it much more difficult to predict the Heels’ play calling.

6. We know about Franklin Street. But what is the best bar on Franklin Street?

Ah, well this blogger is modestly only 20 years of age with six months and six days until he can enjoy the Franklin street festivities. Not that I’m counting or anything.

However, if you want a good locally brewed beer and if you want to get a taste of Chapel Hill, Top of the Hill is the place to be. The beers are based off of local features, and the environment is perfect as the restaurant looks over Franklin Street. Top of the Hill is the place to be on Franklin Street